That n60 maf you, do you have a pretty good transfer curve on it? I am good at mechanical and electrical, the software, tuning, computer side I am not so proficient at. Is there a gauge in TS and does MLV log MAF volts and ADC count? I know I've seen maf gps, and maf map. I'll upload my tune when I get a chance to make the changes. I figured the open time mightactually be higher, but it sounds like it may need to be lower.I haven't made those changes yet. My injectors are Bosch design 3 part# 0280155710? bar. I expect maybe the sensor will be maxed around 200whp in a pull through setup like mine ( maf infront of turbo ) I dynoed in at 148whp with my speed density setup and wastegate with a smaller intercooler, I have no idea what I'm hitting now but I would expect around the same. The n62 out flows it by a bunch and is what people usually go for, but for a n\a 2l the n60 may suffice. The n60 sensor should be able to be found cheap on nissan forums, its not a sensor that people want since its not usually a great upgrade from what they have. This sensor though is too small for me, I plan to go for a N62 which reads more air mass flow. I'm maxing this sensor out at around wastegate pressure up top near 4.4-5v, have to increase the boost to finialize past that to near 5v and it should be done. Unfrountaly my car idles around 1.5v and I only see as low as 1v of airflow so I can only guess airflow under 1v, I do know dead flow is at. My high airflow is close expect past 4.5v, working on middle voltage airflow 2-4v range and my idle voltage area airflow is tweaked in well enough. What MAF sensors do you have curvesw for? I am willing to change it out to get this to work.Ĭurrently finishing up a transfer function for this one. Its in a MAF summary file I found while researching.ģ.9 88.91 durson1 Helpful MS/Extra'er Posts: 35 Joined: Wed 7:54 pmĭurson1 wrote:I think I just need a better starting point. I wish I could remember the source so I could give them credit. Oh well.Īs a side note these are the numbers I'm using. I used the one that maxes around 115 because it starts with a few lines of zero's and have heard thats how they should start. I guess thats why the 2 files I get are different. In a pdf included with the maf program I read that if you include a zero reading it will use linear least squares, any other number it will use a non linear fit.
2 the max flow it shows as 115 which seems way too low, which is close to the file I was trying to use earlier today. I ran the mafanalyzer program a few times tonight and noticed if I run the numbers I have I get a max flow of 188 gps which seems resonable.
0 kommentar(er)
